Lead Counsel independently verifies Zithromax attorneys in North Little Rock by conferring with Arkansas bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
If you have taken Zithromax, you may have experienced harmful side effects and conditions linked to its use. Contact a North Little Rock attorney to learn about your legal options. Many people who have taken Zithromax have successfully sued the drug manufacturer for compensation and other damages.
Zithromax, also sold as a “Z-Pak,” is an antibiotic pill made by Pfizer Pharmaceuticals. Zithromax is prescribed to treat bacterial infections in children and adults but can cause irregular heartbeats, and has been linked with less serious side effects, such as upset stomach, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, problems with vision and hearing, difficulty speaking, tiredness, and dizziness.
An attorney can often resolve your particular legal issue faster and better than trying to do it alone. A lawyer can help you navigate the legal system, while avoiding costly mistakes or procedural errors. You should seek out an attorney whose practice focuses on the area of law most relevant to your issue.
An attorney consultation should provide you with enough information so that you can make an informed decision on whether to proceed with legal help.
In general, how much an attorney costs will often depend on these four factors: billing method and pricing structure, type of legal work performed, law firm prestige, and attorney experience. Depending on the legal issue you are facing, an attorney may bill you by the hour, settle on a flat fee, or enter into a contingency fee agreement. The type of legal work you need help with will also play a role in cost incurred.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.