Lead Counsel independently verifies Medicaid Fraud attorneys in Glastonbury by conferring with Connecticut bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Medicaid fraud occurs when a physician, patient, or other perpetrator uses a fake patient or a legitimate Medicaid member to file a false claim, gives or receives a kickback, or bills unethically. In some cases, legitimate but deceived patients may not know they are involved in fraud until it is too late.
If you have been accused of Medicaid fraud, immediately consult with a Glastonbury defense lawyer who handles Medicaid fraud cases. The lawyer can evaluate your situation, advise you of your legal options and aggressively represent you during an investigation or legal proceeding.
In legal practice, experience matters. An experienced attorney will likely have handled issues similar to yours many, many times. Therefore, after listening to your situation, the attorney should have a reasonable idea of the time line for a case like yours and the likely resolution.
An experienced lawyer should be able to communicate a basic “road map” on how to proceed. The lawyer should be able to walk you through the anticipated process, key considerations, and potential pitfalls to avoid. Once you’ve laid out the facts of your situation to the lawyer, he/she should be able to frame expectations and likely scenarios to help you understand your legal issue.
A reputable attorney will be very upfront about how he/she will charge you. The three most common fee structures that attorneys use to charge for their services are:
Depending on your specific legal situation, it’s possible that only one type of fee structure is available. For instance, criminal defense attorneys almost always bill by the hour. In a flat fee arrangement, an attorney accepts a one-time payment to help you resolve your issue. With a contingent fee agreement, the client pays little to nothing upfront and the attorney receives a percentage of the money recovered if you win your case.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.