Lead Counsel independently verifies Irrevocable Trust attorneys in Greenwood by conferring with Indiana bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
An irrevocable trust is a trust that cannot be modified or terminated without the beneficiary’s permission. This type of trust is generally used for tax purposes. In establishing an irrevocable trust the grantor, the person making the trust, transfers ownership of assets to the trust and can no longer be taxed on those assets.
Establishing an irrevocable trust is a significant undertaking and you will benefit from consulting a Greenwood trust lawyer. The lawyer can assess your situation and advise you if an irrevocable trust is in your best interest. The lawyer can write the trust’s provisions and ensure the trust conforms to your state’s applicable law.
An attorney can often resolve your particular legal issue faster and better than trying to do it alone. A lawyer can help you navigate the legal system, while avoiding costly mistakes or procedural errors. You should seek out an attorney whose practice focuses on the area of law most relevant to your issue.
For most consumer legal issues, the size of the practice is much less important than the experience, competence, and reputation of the attorney(s) handling your case. Among the most important factors when choosing an attorney are your comfort level with the attorney or practice and the attorney’s track record in bringing about quick, successful resolutions to cases similar to yours.
Pro se – This Latin term refers to representing yourself in court instead of hiring professional legal counsel. Pro se representation can occur in either criminal or civil cases.
Statute – Refers to a law created by a legislative body. For example, the laws enacted by Congress are statutes.
Subject matter jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority to hear the claim based on the specific type of issue brought to the court. For example, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court only has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy filings, therefore it does not have the authority to render binding judgment over other types of cases, such as divorce.